✦ For everyone, free.

Practical knowledge for real and everyday life

Home

2.22.4 Tensor Linear Map Scalar Preservation

Tensor linear maps preserve scalar multiplication, ensuring compatibility between algebraic structures and linear transformations in tensor spaces.

Tensor Linear Map Scalar Preservation is the property that the tensor identification of linear maps as elements of V* ⊗ W respects scalar multiplication on both sides of the correspondence, so that the tensor representing a scalar multiple of a linear map equals that same scalar multiple of the tensor representing the original map, and this holds regardless of whether the scalar is absorbed into the map itself, into a chosen dual-vector factor, or into a chosen vector factor of a simple tensor. Together with additivity preservation, scalar preservation completes the demonstration that Hom(V, W) and V* ⊗ W are isomorphic as vector spaces, not merely in bijection as sets.


Scalar Multiplication on the Side of Linear Maps

Pointwise Scalar Multiple Definition

For φ ∈ Hom(V, W) and a scalar c ∈ F, the scalar multiple is defined pointwise by:

cφ v = c φv

for every v ∈ V, matching the ordinary definition of scalar multiplication of functions.

Scalar Preservation Under the Correspondence

If φ corresponds to the tensor α ∈ V* ⊗ W, scalar preservation states that corresponds to , the ordinary scalar multiple of α as an element of the vector space V* ⊗ W. No rescaling of individual tensor factors is required to state this correctly; the claim is about the tensor α as a whole being scaled by c.


Where the Scalar May Be Absorbed

Absorption Into Either Factor of a Simple Tensor

For a simple tensor ω ⊗ w, the defining bilinearity of the tensor product gives:

c ωw = cω w = ω cw

so the scalar c can equivalently be absorbed into the dual-vector factor, into the vector factor, or left outside the tensor product entirely, and all three expressions denote the same element of V* ⊗ W. This flexibility mirrors the corresponding freedom on the side of linear maps: (cφ)(v) = c(ω(v)) w = (cω)(v) w = ω(v)(cw) all describe the same rank-one map.

c(ω ⊗ w) = (cω) ⊗ w = ω ⊗ (cw) scalar moves freely between factors all three expressions are the same tensor

No Ambiguity for General Tensors

For a general element α = Σ ω_k ⊗ w_k of V* ⊗ W, written as a sum of simple tensors, cα = Σ (c ω_k) ⊗ w_k = Σ ω_k ⊗ (c w_k), and any mixture of these placements across different terms of the sum, gives the identical result ; scalar preservation holds regardless of how the scalar is distributed among the terms, since the underlying tensor is determined by the sum as a whole.


Verification in Coordinates

Matrix Scalar Multiplication Matches Tensor Scalar Multiplication

Relative to bases {e_i} of V and {f_j} of W, if φ has matrix entries a^j_i, then has matrix entries c · a^j_i, since (cφ)(e_i) = c φ(e_i) = c Σ_j a^j_i f_j = Σ_j (c a^j_i) f_j. This matches exactly the entrywise scalar multiple of the tensor Σ a^j_i e^i ⊗ f_j, confirming in coordinates that scalar multiplication of matrices is the coordinate expression of scalar multiplication of the corresponding (1, 1)-tensors.


Scalar Preservation as Part of Linearity of the Identification

Together With Additivity, Establishing a Vector-Space Isomorphism

The identification map Θ : V* ⊗ W → Hom(V, W), sending ω ⊗ w to the rank-one map v ↦ ω(v) w and extended linearly, satisfies Θ(cα) = cΘ(α) precisely because scalar preservation holds; combined with additivity preservation, Θ(α + β) = Θ(α) + Θ(β), this shows Θ is a linear map. Since Θ is also bijective, matching bases as described in tensor linear map structure, Θ is a full vector-space isomorphism, and scalar preservation is the second of the two properties, alongside additivity, that this isomorphism claim requires.

Consistency With Scalar Multiplication by Zero and One

Setting c = 1 gives 1 · φ = φ and 1 · α = α, consistent trivially. Setting c = 0 gives the zero map and the zero tensor respectively, matching the earlier observation that Θ sends the zero tensor to the zero map; scalar preservation at these boundary values confirms that the correspondence behaves correctly at the extremes of scalar multiplication, not merely for generic nonzero scalars.